FORM 10-Q
[X] Quarterly report pursuant to section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the
quarterly period ended May 5, 2001, or
[ ] Transition report pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from _______ to ________.
Commission file number 1-10714
AUTOZONE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
incorporation or organization) |
Identification No.) |
123 South Front Street
Memphis, Tennessee 38103
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(901) 495-6500
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
(not applicable)
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if
changed since last report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value - 111,985,535 shares as of May 25, 2001.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
AUTOZONE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
ASSETS
2001 (Unaudited) |
2000 |
|||
Curret Assets: | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 7,188
|
$ 6,969
|
||
Accounts receivable |
22,581
|
21,407
|
||
Merchandise inventories |
1,214,942
|
1,108,978
|
||
Prepaid expenses |
29,319
|
30,214
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
19,586
|
19,212
|
||
Total current assets |
1,293,616
|
1,186,780
|
||
Property and equipment: | ||||
Property and equipment |
2,414,098
|
2,320,376
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
643,788
|
561,936
|
||
1,770,310
|
1,758,440
|
|||
Other assets: | ||||
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
320,424
|
324,494
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
51,497
|
52,182
|
||
Other assets |
11,319
|
11,322
|
||
383,240
|
387,998
|
|||
$ 3,447,166
========= |
$ 3,333,218
========= |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities: | ||||
Accounts payable |
$ 782,007
|
$ 788,825
|
||
Accrued expenses |
240,796
|
227,682
|
||
Income taxes payable |
89,018
|
18,037
|
||
Total current liabilities |
1,111,821
|
1,034,544
|
||
Long-term debt |
1,392,729
|
1,249,937
|
||
Other liabilities |
52,970
|
56,558
|
||
Stockholders' equity |
889,646
|
992,179
|
||
$ 3,447,166
========= |
$ 3,333,218
========= |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
AUTOZONE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Twelve
|
Weeks Ended |
Thirty-Six
|
Weeks Ended | |||
2001 |
2000 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
Net Sales |
$ 1,139,957
|
$ 1,059,415
|
$ 3,177,522
|
$ 2,990,051
|
||
Cost of sales, including warehouse | ||||||
and delivery expenses |
657,379
|
609,497
|
1,852,046
|
1,730,190
|
||
Operating, selling, general and | ||||||
administrative expenses |
354,712
|
323,234
|
1,009,562
|
947,416
|
||
Operating profit |
127,866
|
126,684
|
315,914
|
312,445
|
||
Interest expense, net |
23,841
|
17,419
|
72,365
|
48,475
|
||
Income before income taxes |
104,025
|
109,265
|
243,549
|
263,970
|
||
Income taxes |
40,500
|
42,000
|
94,500
|
101,600
|
||
Net income |
$ 63,525
======== |
$ 67,265
======= |
$ 149,049
======= |
$ 162,370
========= |
||
Weighted average shares | ||||||
for basic earnings per share |
112,364
|
133,322
|
114,330
|
136,880
|
||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
673
|
1,102
|
531
|
975
|
||
Adjusted weighted average shares | ||||||
for diluted earnings per share |
113,037
========= |
134,424
========= |
114,861
========= |
137,855
========= |
||
Basic earnings per share |
$ 0.57
======== |
$ 0.50
======= |
$ 1.30
======= |
$ 1.19
======= |
||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ 0.56
======== |
$ 0.50
======= |
$ 1.30
======= |
$ 1.18
======= |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
AUTOZONE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Thirty-Six
|
Weeks Ended | ||
2001 |
2000 |
||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||
Net income |
$ 149,049
|
$ 162,370
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net | |||
cash provided by operating activities: | |||
Depreciation and amortization |
91,694
|
88,081
|
|
Net increase in merchandise inventories |
(105,964)
|
(3,489)
|
|
Net change in current liabilities |
77,275
|
(49,039)
|
|
Other - net |
(5,872)
|
20,747
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
206,182
|
218,670
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(137,305)
|
(180,144)
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
43,353
|
10,400
|
|
Increase in other assets |
(5,175)
|
||
Notes receivable from officers |
23
|
(4,113)
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
(99,104)
|
(173,857)
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||
Net proceeds from debt |
142,792
|
327,071
|
|
Purchase of Treasury Stock |
(261,590)
|
(376,508)
|
|
Proceeds from sale of Common Stock |
8,128
|
3,906
|
|
Other |
3,811
|
1,621
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
(106,859)
|
(43,910)
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
219
|
903
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
6,969
|
5,918
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ 7,188
======== |
$ 6,821
======== |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note A-Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the fiscal 2001 presentation. Operating results for the thirty-six weeks ended May 5, 2001, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending August 25, 2001. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 26, 2000.
Note B-Adoption of a New Accounting Standard
On August 27, 2000, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," (SFAS 133) as amended. SFAS 133 requires the Company to recognize all derivative instruments in the balance sheet at fair value. The adoption of SFAS 133 impacts the accounting for the Company's interest rate hedging program. The Company reduces its exposure to increases in interest rates by entering into interest rate swap contracts. All of the Company's interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges.
Upon adoption of SFAS 133, the Company recorded the fair value of the interest rate swaps in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. On an on-going basis, the Company will reflect the current fair value of interest rate swaps on its balance sheet. The related gains or losses on these swaps are deferred in stockholders' equity (as a component of comprehensive income). These deferred gains and losses are recognized in income in the period in which the related interest rates being hedged have been recognized in expense. However, to the extent that the change in value of an interest rate swap contract does not perfectly offset the change in the value of the interest rate being hedged, that ineffective portion is immediately recognized in income.
Note C-Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must necessarily be based on management's estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs.
Note D-Financing Arrangements
The Company's long-term debt as of May 5, 2001, and August 26, 2000,
consisted of the following (in thousands):
2001 |
2000 |
|||||
6% Notes due November 2003 |
$ 150,000
|
$ 150,000
|
||||
6.5% Debentures due July 2008 |
190,000
|
190,000
|
||||
Bank Term Loan due |
115,000
|
|||||
December 2003, weighted | ||||||
average rate of 6.1% at | ||||||
May 5, 2001 | ||||||
Commercial Paper, | ||||||
weighted average rate of 5.5% at | ||||||
May 5, 2001, and 6.8% at | ||||||
August 26, 2000 |
757,590
|
767,300
|
||||
Unsecured Bank Loans |
159,500
|
120,000
|
||||
Other |
20,639
|
22,637
|
||||
$ 1,392,729
========= |
$ 1,249,937
========= |
In November 1998, the Company sold $150 million of 6% Notes due November 2003 at a discount. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 each year. In July 1998, the Company sold $200 million of 6.5% Debentures due July 2008 at a discount. Interest on the Debentures is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year. Proceeds from the Notes and Debentures were used to repay portions of the Company's long-term variable rate bank debt and for general corporate purposes. In July 2000, the Company purchased $10 million of its 6.5% Debentures due July 2008, resulting in a $1.9 million gain.
The Company has a commercial paper program that allows borrowings up to $1.3 billion. In connection with the program, the Company has a credit facility with a group of banks for up to $650 million that extends until May 2005 and a 364-day $650 million credit facility with another group of banks that extends until May 2001. The 364-day facility includes a renewal feature as well as an option to extinguish the then outstanding debt one year from the maturity date. Borrowings under the commercial paper program reduce availability under the credit facilities. Outstanding commercial paper and short-term bank loans at May 5, 2001 of $917.1 million are classified as long-term debt as the Company has the ability and intention to refinance them on a long-term basis.
The rate of interest payable under the bank credit facilities is a function of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the lending bank's base rate (as defined in the agreement) or a competitive bid rate at the option of the Company. The Company has agreed to observe certain covenants under the terms of its credit agreements, including limitations on total indebtedness, restrictions on liens and minimum fixed charge coverage.
In December 2000, the Company entered into a $115 million 3-year unsecured bank term loan with a group of banks. The rate of interest payable is a function of LIBOR or the lending bank's base rate (as defined in the agreement) at the option of the Company.
In addition, during fiscal year 2001 the Company entered into unsecured bank loans with maturity dates from May to July 2001 and interest rates ranging from 4.85% to 6.14%. As of May 5, 2001, $159.5 million was outstanding under these agreements.
Subsequent to the end of the quarter, the Company replaced the expiring $650 million 364-day facility with a new $400 million 364-day credit agreement and a $200 million two-year unsecured term loan with a group of banks. The new $400 million 364-day facility includes a renewal feature as well as an option to extinguish the outstanding debt one year from maturity. The facility supports domestic commercial paper borrowings, and the rate of interest payable under the bank credit facilities is a function of LIBOR, the lending bank's base rate (as defined in the agreement) or a competitive bid rate at the option of the Company. The $200 million two-year unsecured bank loan term loan matures in May 2003 and the rate of interest is a function of LIBOR or the lending bank's base rate (as defined in the agreement) at the option of the Company. The Company has agreed to observe certain covenants under the terms of its credit agreements, including limitations on total indebtedness, restrictions on liens and minimum fixed charge coverage.
In addition to the above and subsequent to the end of the quarter, the Company issued $150 million of 7.99% Senior Notes due April 2006, in a private debt placement in May 2001. The Senior Notes contain certain covenants limiting total indebtedness and liens. The interest is payable semi-annually.
Note E-Stockholders' Equity
The Company presents basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share." Basic EPS is computed as net earnings divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock-based compensation including stock options.
As of May 5, 2001, the Company's Board of Directors had authorized the Company to repurchase up to $1.35 billion of common stock in the open market. Since January 1998, approximately $1.13 billion of common stock has been repurchased under the plan. At times, the Company utilizes equity instrument contracts to facilitate its repurchase of common stock. At May 5, 2001, the Company held equity instrument contracts that relate to the purchase of approximately 5.8 million shares of common stock at an average cost of $22.60 per share.
Note F-Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes changes in the fair value of certain derivative financial instruments which qualify for hedge accounting and foreign currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive income totaled $61.8 million for the quarter ended May 5, 2001, compared to $67.3 million in the comparable period of fiscal 2000. Comprehensive income totaled $145.3 million for the thirty-six week period ended May 5, 2001 compared to $162.4 in the comparable period of fiscal 2000. Included in other comprehensive income was a reduction in the fair value of certain derivative financial instruments which qualify for hedge accounting totaling $4.0 million at May 5, 2001 and none at August 26, 2000.
Note G-Sale and Leaseback Transaction
During the first quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company sold properties which were leased back from the purchaser under a 22-year operating lease agreement. Gains realized from the sale and leaseback transaction were deferred and are being recognized over the life of the leases. The leases contain renewal options and generally provide that the Company will pay property taxes, common area maintenance, insurance and repairs. As of May 5, 2001, net proceeds of $5.2 million from this transaction are held in escrow until such time as suitable replacement properties can be purchased in an exchange under section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Note H-Contingencies
AutoZone, Inc. is a defendant in a class action lawsuit entitled "Melvin Quinnie on behalf of all others similarly situated v. AutoZone, Inc., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive" filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, in November 1998. The plaintiff claims that the defendants failed to pay overtime to store managers as required by California law and failed to pay terminated managers in a timely manner as required by California law. The plaintiff is seeking injunctive relief, restitution, statutory penalties, prejudgment interest, and reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses and costs. On April 3, 2000, the court certified the class as consisting of all AutoZone store managers, and Chief managers who became AutoZone employees in standardized stores on January 1, 1999, for their claims since January 1, 1999, only. The Company and the plaintiffs' attorneys have reached a settlement that is subject to court approval. In the event that final settlement is not approved by the court, the Company will continue to vigorously defend against this action. The potential damages recoverable by any single plaintiff are minimal. However, if the plaintiff class were to prevail on all of its claims, the aggregate amount of damages could be substantial.
AutoZone, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Chief Auto Parts Inc., were defendants in a purported class action lawsuit entitled "Paul D. Rusch, on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Chief Auto Parts Inc., and AutoZone, Inc." filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, in May 1999. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants failed to pay their store managers overtime pay from March 1997 to present. The plaintiffs were seeking back overtime pay, interest, an injunction against the defendants committing such practices in the future, costs, and attorneys' fees. The parties have settled the lawsuit and the settlement has received court approval. The terms of the settlement were not material to the operations or consolidated financial position of the Company.
AutoZone, Inc. is a defendant in a lawsuit entitled "Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C., et al., v. AutoZone, Inc., et al.," filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in February, 2000. The case was filed by over 100 plaintiffs, which are principally automotive aftermarket warehouse distributors and jobbers, against eight defendants, which are principally automotive aftermarket parts retailers. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants have knowingly received volume discounts, rebates, slotting and other allowances, fees, free inventory, sham advertising and promotional payments, a share in the manufacturers' profits, and excessive payments for services purportedly performed for the manufacturers in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act. Plaintiffs seek approximately $1 billion in damages (including statutory trebling) and a permanent injunction prohibiting defendants from committing further violations of the Robinson-Patman Act and from opening up any further stores to compete with plaintiffs as long as defendants continue to violate the Act. The Company believes this suit to be without merit and will vigorously defend against it. A motion to dismiss this action has been filed by the defendants in this lawsuit and is currently pending before the court.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Twelve Weeks Ended May 5, 2001, Compared to
Twelve Weeks Ended May 6, 2000
Net sales for the twelve weeks ended May 5, 2001, increased by $80.5 million, or 7.6%, over net sales for the comparable period of fiscal 2000. Comparable store sales, or sales for domestic auto parts stores opened at least one year, increased 5%. At May 5, 2001, the Company had 2,994 domestic auto parts stores in operation compared with 2,854 at May 6, 2000.
Gross profit for the twelve weeks ended May 6, 2000, was $482.6 million, or 42.3% of net sales, compared with $449.9 million, or 42.5% of net sales, during the comparable period for fiscal 2000.
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for the twelve weeks ended May 5, 2001, increased by $31.5 million over such expenses for the comparable period for fiscal 2000, and increased as a percentage of net sales from 30.5% to 31.1%. The increase in the expense ratio is primarily due to expense recognized in conjunction with the write-off of costs related to abandoned real estate projects in process that did not meet revised Company hurdle rates.
Interest expense for the twelve weeks ended May 5, 2001, was $23.8 million compared with $17.4 million during the comparable period of 2000. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to higher levels of borrowings.
The Company's effective income tax rate was 38.9% of pre-tax income for the twelve weeks ended May 5, 2001, and 38.4% for the twelve weeks ended May 6, 2000. The increase in tax rate was due to increased profitability in higher tax rate jurisdictions.
Thirty-Six Weeks Ended May 5, 2001, Compared to
Thirty-Six Weeks Ended May 6, 2000
Net sales for the thirty-six weeks ended May 5, 2001, increased by $187.5 million, or 6.3%, over net sales for the comparable period of fiscal 2000. Comparable store sales, or sales for domestic auto parts stores opened at least one year, increased 3%.
Gross profit for the thirty-six weeks ended May 5, 2001, was $1.33 billion, or 41.7% of net sales, compared with $1.26 billion, or 41.8% of net sales, during the comparable period for fiscal 2000.
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for the thirty-six weeks ended May 5, 2001, increased by $62.1 million over such expenses for the comparable period for fiscal 2000, and increased as a percentage of net sales from 31.7% to 31.8%. The increase in the expense ratio is primarily due to expense recognized in conjunction with the write-off of costs related to abandoned real estate projects in process that did not meet revised Company hurdle rates.
Interest expense for the thirty-six weeks ended May 5, 2001, was $72.4 million compared with $48.5 million during the comparable period of 2000. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to higher levels of borrowings.
The Company's effective income tax rate was 38.8% of pre-tax income for the thirty-six weeks ended May 5, 2001 and 38.5% for the thirty-six weeks ended May 6, 2000. The increase in tax rate was due to increased profitability in higher tax rate jurisdictions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the thirty-six weeks ended May 5, 2001, net cash of $206.2 million was provided by the Company's operations versus $214.4 million for the comparable period of fiscal year 2000.
Additionally, $99.2 million was used in investing activities by the Company compared with the use of $173.9 million in the comparable period of fiscal year 2000. The decrease in investing activities as compared to the thirty-six weeks of the prior year is primarily due to the receipt of $39.5 million from the sale of real estate pursuant to a sale and leaseback transaction coupled with lower capital spending. Of these proceeds, $5.2 million is being held in restricted cash accounts, as the Company anticipates deferring a portion of its tax expense related to this transaction by replacing these properties. Capital expenditures for the thirty-six weeks ended May 5, 2001, were $137.3 million. Year-to-date, the Company opened 82 new domestic auto parts stores, closed 3 stores and replaced 13 existing stores.
As of May 5, 2001, the Company's Board of Directors had authorized the Company to repurchase up to $1.35 billion of common stock in the open market. Since January 1998, approximately $1.13 billion of common stock has been repurchased under the plan. At times, the Company utilizes equity instrument contracts to facilitate its repurchase of common stock. At May 5, 2001, the Company held equity instrument contracts that relate to the purchase of approximately 5.8 million shares of common stock at an average cost of $22.60 per share.
The Company anticipates that it will rely primarily on internally-generated funds to support a majority of its capital expenditures, working capital requirements and stock repurchases. The balance will be funded through borrowings. The Company anticipates that it will be able to obtain such financing in view of its credit rating and favorable experiences in the debt market in the past.
The Company has a commercial paper program that allows borrowing up to $1.3 billion. In connection with the program, the Company had a credit facility with a group of banks for up to $650 million which extends until May 2005 and a 364-day $650 million credit facility with another group of banks that extends until May 2001. The 364-day facility included a renewal feature as well as an option to extinguish the then outstanding debt one year from the maturity date. Borrowings under the commercial paper program reduce availability under the credit facilities. Outstanding commercial paper and short-term bank loans at May 5, 2001 of $917 million are classified as long-term debt as the Company has the ability and intention to refinance them on a long-term basis.
In December 2000, the Company entered into a $115 million 3-year unsecured bank term loan with a group of banks. The rate of interest payable is a function of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or the lending bank's base rate (as defined in the agreement) at the option of the Company. In addition, during fiscal year 2001 the Company entered into unsecured bank loans with maturity dates from May to July 2001 and interest rates ranging from 4.85% to 6.14%. As of May 5, 2001, $159.5 million was outstanding under these agreements.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company entered into a synthetic lease facility with $30 million capacity to fund the capital requirements for the construction of new stores and the new ALLDATA headquarters complex. As of May 5, 2001, approximately $11.8 million of construction costs had been funded under this facility.
Subsequent to the end of the quarter, the Company replaced the expiring $650 million 364-day facility with a new $400 million 364-day credit agreement and a $200 million two-year unsecured term loan with a group of banks. The new $400 million 364-day facility includes a renewal feature as well as an option to extinguish the outstanding debt one year from maturity. The facility supports domestic commercial paper borrowings. The $200 million two-year unsecured bank loan term loan matures in May 2003 and the rate of interest is a function of LIBOR or the lending bank's base rate (as defined in the agreement) at the option of the Company.
In addition to the above and subsequent to the end of the quarter, the Company issued $150 million of 7.99% Senior Notes due April 2006, in a private debt placement in May 2001. The Senior Notes contain certain covenants limiting total indebtedness and liens. The interest is payable semi-annually.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. These statements discuss, among other things, expected growth, domestic and international development and expansion strategy, business strategies, and future performance. The forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions including, without limitation, competition, product demand, domestic and international economies, the ability to hire and retain qualified employees, consumer debt levels, inflation and the weather. Actual results may materially differ from anticipated results. Please refer to the Risk Factors section in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended August 26, 2000, for more details.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Incorporated by reference to Part II, Item 7A, of the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2000.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
AutoZone, Inc. is a defendant in a class action lawsuit entitled "Melvin Quinnie on behalf of all others similarly situated v. AutoZone, Inc., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive" filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, in November 1998. The plaintiff claims that the defendants failed to pay overtime to store managers as required by California law and failed to pay terminated managers in a timely manner as required by California law. The plaintiff is seeking injunctive relief, restitution, statutory penalties, prejudgment interest, and reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses and costs. On April 3, 2000, the court certified the class as consisting of all AutoZone store managers, and Chief managers who became AutoZone employees in standardized stores on January 1, 1999, for their claims since January 1, 1999, only. The Company and the plaintiffs' attorneys have reached a settlement that is subject to court approval. In the event that final settlement is not approved by the court, the Company will continue to vigorously defend against this action. The potential damages recoverable by any single plaintiff are minimal. However, if the plaintiff class were to prevail on all of its claims, the aggregate amount of damages could be substantial.
AutoZone, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Chief Auto Parts Inc., were defendants in a purported class action lawsuit entitled "Paul D. Rusch, on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Chief Auto Parts Inc., and AutoZone, Inc." filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, in May 1999. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants failed to pay their store managers overtime pay from March 1997 to present. The plaintiffs were seeking back overtime pay, interest, an injunction against the defendants committing such practices in the future, costs, and attorneys' fees. The parties have settled the lawsuit and the settlement has received court approval. The terms of the settlement were not material to the operations or consolidated financial position of the company.
AutoZone, Inc. is a defendant in a lawsuit entitled "Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C., et al., v. AutoZone, Inc., et al.," filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in February, 2000. The case was filed by over 100 plaintiffs, which are principally automotive aftermarket warehouse distributors and jobbers, against eight defendants, which are principally automotive aftermarket parts retailers. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants have knowingly received volume discounts, rebates, slotting and other allowances, fees, free inventory, sham advertising and promotional payments, a share in the manufacturers' profits, and excessive payments for services purportedly performed for the manufacturers in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act. Plaintiffs seek approximately $1 billion in damages (including statutory trebling) and a permanent injunction prohibiting defendants from committing further violations of the Robinson-Patman Act and from opening up any further stores to compete with plaintiffs as long as defendants continue to violate the Act. The Company believes this suit to be without merit and will vigorously defend against it. A motion to dismiss this action has been filed by the defendants in this lawsuit and is currently pending before the court.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a)
|
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report: | ||
3.1
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 13, 1999. | ||
3.2
|
Second Amended and Restated By-laws of AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Form 8-K dated March 21, 2000. | ||
(b)
|
The Company filed a Form 8-K dated February 27, 2001, containing a press release announcing its earnings for the fiscal quarter ended February 10, 2001. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AUTOZONE, INC.
By: /s/ ROBERT J. HUNT
Robert J. Hunt
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
By: /s/ TRICIA K. GREENBERGER
Tricia K. Greenberger
Vice President, Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Dated: May 31, 2001
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
3.1
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 13, 1999. |
3.2
|
Second Amended and Restated By-laws of AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Form 8-K dated March 21, 2000. |